COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
DECK vs MBC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DECK scored 80.0, MBC scored 24.9 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
80
$86.33 · $11.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
55.1
DECK leads
MBC
MasterBrand, Inc.
24.9
$8.66 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthDECK+7.9%
- Strongest balance sheetDECK0.21
- Highest qualityDECK96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDECK-32%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DECK
stronger →← stronger
MBC
96
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
26
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
41
DECK is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DECK
MBC
$1.1bC+
FCF
$74mC-
+7.9%B
Rev
-0.0%D+
0.21A-
D/E
0.86B
12.3xA-
P/E
—
1.09B+
PEG
—
—
P/S
0.6xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DECK
MBC
32% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
37% above
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
+33%
1-yr DCF upside
-44%
+47%
5-yr DCF upside
-27%
+70%
10-yr DCF upside
+6%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
MBC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $11.8b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MBCMasterBrand, Inc.
Why now
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $1.8b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $14.22 — deep drawdown territory. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $10.36 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DECK and MBC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 55.1 points in favor of DECK. The widest single difference is Quality, where DECK leads by 69.4 points.
- QualityDECK 95.8 · MBC 26.4DECK +69.4
- GrowthDECK 74.3 · MBC 14.3DECK +60.0
- ValueDECK 71.9 · MBC 40.8DECK +31.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.