COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

MARA vs FUTU

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. MARA scored 77.0, FUTU scored 80.0 — FUTU leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MARA's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FUTU's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
Capital Markets · Bank · REIT
—
$9.65 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
Different scales
—
Not directly comparable
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
Capital Markets · Financial strength
67.9Fin
$113.71 · $15.9B
fundamentals as of
P/BMARA2.22FUTU3.18
YieldMARA0.0%FUTU2.4%
MARA
FUTU
+38.2%A
Rev
—
—
P/E
11.3xB+
—
ROE
30.5%A
2.22C+
P/B
3.18C
0.0%C
Yield
2.4%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
MARAMARA Holdings, Inc.
Capital Markets · $9.65 · beta 5.35
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $3.7b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $23.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +38% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.10 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.61 (implying +93% upside).
Moat
Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 5.35 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
FUTUFutu Holdings Limited
Capital Markets · $113.71 · beta 0.44
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $15.9b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $202.53 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $160.85 (implying +41% upside).
Moat
Net margin 46% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Duration mismatch — the asset and liability books reprice on different schedules; a rapid move in rates either direction can compress net interest margin before management can reposition.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is FUTU or MARA the better stock?

FUTU scores higher: FUTU 80.0, MARA 77.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are FUTU and MARA scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.