COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CELH vs LW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CELH scored 72.5, LW scored 60.1 — CELH leads.
Compare another set
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
72.5
$33.36 · $8.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.4
CELH leads
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
60.1
$53.68 · $7.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLW25.8x
- Fastest growthCELH+82.9%
- Strongest balance sheetCELH0.23
- Highest qualityLW65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLW-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CELH
stronger →← stronger
LW
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
58
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
CELH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CELH
LW
$463mC
FCF
$540mC+
+82.9%A
Rev
+2.5%C
0.23A-
D/E
2.21C
145.0xD
P/E
25.8xC+
0.35A
PEG
0.88B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CELH
LW
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
23% below
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+1%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
+27%
5-yr DCF upside
+29%
+77%
10-yr DCF upside
+51%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $8.4b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $66.74 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +83% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.35 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $40.95 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 145.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 4.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
LWLamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $7.4b. 20% off the 52-week high of $67.07. PEG 0.88 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $55.25 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 186% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.21 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CELH and LW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.4 points in favor of CELH. The widest single difference is Growth, where CELH leads by 42.4 points.
- GrowthCELH 100.0 · LW 57.6CELH +42.4
- ValueCELH 59.5 · LW 57.9level
- QualityCELH 64.0 · LW 65.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.