COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
LVS vs RSI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LVS scored 68.0, RSI scored 54.5 — LVS leads.
Compare another set
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
68
$47.03 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.5
LVS leads
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
54.5
$26.42 · $6.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLVS18.2x
- Fastest growthRSI+34.3%
- Highest qualityLVS92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLVS-48%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LVS
stronger →← stronger
RSI
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
41
LVS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LVS
RSI
$2.7bB
FCF
$182mC
+18.1%B+
Rev
+34.3%A
—
D/E
0.02A
18.2xB
P/E
82.6xD
1.12B+
PEG
2.39C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LVS
RSI
48% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
116% above
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
+66%
1-yr DCF upside
-64%
+90%
5-yr DCF upside
-54%
+134%
10-yr DCF upside
-33%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LVS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
RSI
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $30.5b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
RSIRush Street Interactive, Inc.
Why now
Gambling · market cap $6.5b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $34.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $36.00 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 82.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.52 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LVS and RSI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.5 points in favor of LVS. The widest single difference is Value, where LVS leads by 26.6 points.
- ValueLVS 68.0 · RSI 41.4LVS +26.6
- QualityLVS 92.3 · RSI 78.2LVS +14.1
- GrowthLVS 50.0 · RSI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.