COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
LVS vs MGM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LVS scored 68.0, MGM scored 58.0 — LVS leads.
Compare another set
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
68
$47.03 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.0
LVS leads
MGM
MGM Resorts International
58
$43.69 · $11.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLVS18.2x
- Fastest growthLVS+18.1%
- Highest qualityLVS92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLVS-48%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LVS
stronger →← stronger
MGM
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
LVS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LVS
MGM
$2.7bB
FCF
$1.5bC+
+18.1%B+
Rev
+3.2%C+
—
D/E
8.93D
18.2xB
P/E
26.5xC+
1.12B+
PEG
0.61A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LVS
MGM
48% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
47% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+66%
1-yr DCF upside
+71%
+90%
5-yr DCF upside
+88%
+134%
10-yr DCF upside
+114%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LVS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
MGM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $30.5b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MGMMGM Resorts International
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $11.2b. 15% off the 52-week high of $51.59. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $50.63 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 8.93 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 2.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LVS and MGM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.0 points in favor of LVS. The widest single difference is Quality, where LVS leads by 31.9 points.
- QualityLVS 92.3 · MGM 60.4LVS +31.9
- ValueLVS 68.0 · MGM 64.8LVS +3.2
- GrowthLVS 50.0 · MGM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.