COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
LULU vs TPR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LULU scored 70.0, TPR scored 68.4 — LULU leads.
Compare another set
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
70
$122.18 · $13.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.6
LULU leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
68.4
$156.31 · $31.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LULU
stronger →← stronger
TPR
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
46
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
84
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
LULU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LULU
TPR
$1.3bC+
FCF
$1.8bC+
+4.2%C+
Rev
+14.1%B+
0.44B+
D/E
5.75D
9.9xA
P/E
47.7xD
0.91B+
PEG
0.31A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LULU
TPR
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
38% above
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
+52%
1-yr DCF upside
-35%
+51%
5-yr DCF upside
-27%
+50%
10-yr DCF upside
-16%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LULU
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
LULUlululemon athletica inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $13.9b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $225.98 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.91 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $127.73 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $31.6b. 3% off the 52-week high of $161.97. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.15 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 97% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 5.75 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.