COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CVSA vs LRN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVSA scored 79.6, LRN scored 81.9 — LRN leads.
Compare another set
CVSA
Covista Inc.
79.6
$128.04 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.3
LRN leads
LRN
Stride, Inc.
81.9
$84.07 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLRN11.8x
- Fastest growthCVSA+9.3%
- Strongest balance sheetLRN0.33
- Highest qualityLRN86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCVSA-55%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVSA
stronger →← stronger
LRN
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
78
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
96
LRN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVSA
LRN
$393mC
FCF
$433mC
+9.3%B
Rev
+4.7%C+
0.63B+
D/E
0.33A-
17.1xB+
P/E
11.8xA
0.97B+
PEG
0.49A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVSA
LRN
55% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
~-11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+102%
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
+124%
5-yr DCF upside
+97%
+160%
10-yr DCF upside
+109%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVSA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
LRN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CVSACovista Inc.
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $4.4b. 18% off the 52-week high of $156.26. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $159.50 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 156% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LRNStride, Inc.
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $3.5b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $171.17 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.49 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 128% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors LRN (84.3) over CVSA (81.2) due to LRN's superior Value pillar score of 94, significantly higher than CVSA's 79. A contrarian could still prefer CVSA, which trades at a substantial -56% discount to our DCF fair value, implying very little optimism is priced in.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CVSA and LRN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.3 points in favor of LRN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCVSA 78.4 · LRN 95.7LRN +17.3
- GrowthCVSA 80.1 · LRN 66.9CVSA +13.2
- QualityCVSA 80.2 · LRN 86.1LRN +5.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.