COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LPX vs WMS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LPX scored 15.9, WMS scored 72.4 — WMS leads.
Compare another set
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
15.9
$73.18 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
56.5
WMS leads
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
72.4
$143.73 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthWMS+10.4%
- Strongest balance sheetLPX0.22
- Highest qualityWMS81 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LPX
stronger →← stronger
WMS
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
6
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
WMS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LPX
WMS
-$21mF
FCF
$550mC+
-14.3%D
Rev
+10.4%B
0.22A-
D/E
0.97C+
2.1xB
P/S
—
3.68D
PEG
1.38B
—
P/E
24.5xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LPX
WMS
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
21% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-31%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-18%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+5%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LPX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
WMS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
LPXLouisiana-Pacific Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $5.1b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $101.28 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -14% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.23 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$21m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 95.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Revenue contracting -14% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line.
WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $10.8b. 20% off the 52-week high of $179.31. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $183.36 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LPX and WMS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 56.5 points in favor of WMS. The widest single difference is Growth, where WMS leads by 66.0 points.
- GrowthLPX 14.1 · WMS 80.1WMS +66.0
- ValueLPX 5.9 · WMS 58.5WMS +52.6
- QualityLPX 47.9 · WMS 80.9WMS +33.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.