COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GFF vs LPX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GFF scored 77.9, LPX scored 15.9 — GFF leads.
Compare another set
GFF
Griffon Corporation
77.9
$100.55 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
62.0
GFF leads
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
15.9
$73.18 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthGFF+26.9%
- Highest qualityGFF81 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GFF
stronger →← stronger
LPX
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
48
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
6
GFF is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GFF
LPX
$297mC
FCF
-$21mF
+26.9%A-
Rev
-14.3%D
—
D/E
0.22A-
21.0xB+
P/E
—
0.54A-
PEG
3.68D
—
P/S
2.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GFF
LPX
9% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+11%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GFF
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
LPX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
GFFGriffon Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.6b. 7% off the 52-week high of $108.57. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.57 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LPXLouisiana-Pacific Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $5.1b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $101.28 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -14% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.23 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$21m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 95.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Revenue contracting -14% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GFF and LPX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 62.0 points in favor of GFF. The widest single difference is Value, where GFF leads by 67.5 points.
- ValueGFF 73.4 · LPX 5.9GFF +67.5
- GrowthGFF 79.9 · LPX 14.1GFF +65.8
- QualityGFF 80.5 · LPX 47.9GFF +32.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.