COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

EXPO vs LPX

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXPO scored 73.7, LPX scored 15.9 — EXPO leads.
Compare another set
EXPO
Exponent, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · Quality-Growth
73.7
$70.21 · $3.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
57.8
EXPO leads
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Building Products & Equipment · Quality-Growth
15.9
$73.18 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthEXPO+12.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetLPX0.22
  • Highest qualityEXPO92 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD73.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY92.3GROWTH84.0VALUE51.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD15.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY47.9GROWTH14.1VALUE5.9
EXPOLPXQuality92.347.9Growth84.014.1Value51.75.9
FCFEXPO$109mLPX-$21m
RevEXPO+12.8%LPX-14.3%
D/EEXPO0.28LPX0.22
PEGEXPO2.03LPX3.68
EXPO
stronger →← stronger
LPX
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
48
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
6
EXPO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
EXPO
LPX
$109mC
FCF
-$21mF
+12.8%B+
Rev
-14.3%D
0.28A-
D/E
0.22A-
31.5xB
P/E
2.03C
PEG
3.68D
P/S
2.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
EXPO
LPX
25% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
~14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
-30%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
5-yr DCF upside
-2%
10-yr DCF upside
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
EXPO
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
LPX
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
EXPOExponent, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · $70.21 · beta 0.68
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $3.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $81.95. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $84.00 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 39% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 97% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
LPXLouisiana-Pacific Corporation
Building Products & Equipment · $73.18 · beta 1.59
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $5.1b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $101.28 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -14% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.23 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$21m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 95.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Revenue contracting -14% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where EXPO and LPX diverge

On the headline score the gap is 57.8 points in favor of EXPO. The widest single difference is Growth, where EXPO leads by 69.9 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.