COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LPG vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LPG scored 68.8, RRC scored 66.3 — LPG leads.
Compare another set
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
68.8
$51.13 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.5
LPG leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66.3
$41.06 · $9.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLPG6.8x
- Fastest growthLPG+81.1%
- Strongest balance sheetRRC0.22
- Highest qualityRRC89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRRC-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LPG
stronger →← stronger
RRC
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
LPG and RRC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LPG
RRC
$239mC
FCF
$1.4bC+
+81.1%A
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.52B
D/E
0.22A-
6.8xA-
P/E
11.3xB+
—
PEG
1.03B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LPG
RRC
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+83%
1-yr DCF upside
+95%
+64%
5-yr DCF upside
+79%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
+59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LPG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $2.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $52.10 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +81% — in hypergrowth territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.80 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.64 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors LPG (68.4) over RRC (65.6) primarily due to its superior Value pillar score of 75, reflected in an A-grade P/E of 6.1x. However, a contrarian might prefer RRC for its stronger balance sheet, evidenced by an A-grade Debt/Equity of 0.22, despite its lower overall ranking and a "Short track record" signal.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LPG and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.5 points in favor of LPG. The widest single difference is Value, where LPG leads by 10.2 points.
- ValueLPG 75.5 · RRC 65.3LPG +10.2
- QualityLPG 86.1 · RRC 89.0level
- GrowthLPG 50.0 · RRC 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.