COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LPG vs PARR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LPG scored 68.8, PARR scored 68.4 — LPG leads.
Compare another set
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
68.8
$51.13 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.4
LPG leads
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
68.4
$79.03 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPARR4.6x
- Fastest growthLPG+81.1%
- Strongest balance sheetLPG0.52
- Highest qualityLPG86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLPG-39%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LPG
stronger →← stronger
PARR
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
88
LPG and PARR split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LPG
PARR
$239mC
FCF
$412mC
+81.1%A
Rev
+13.2%B+
0.52B
D/E
0.56B
6.8xA-
P/E
4.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LPG
PARR
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+83%
1-yr DCF upside
+69%
+64%
5-yr DCF upside
+52%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
+30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LPG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
PARR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $2.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $52.10 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +81% — in hypergrowth territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.80 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $87.03. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.00 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
LPG leads the rankings with a score of 69, primarily driven by its superior Quality pillar of 85 compared to PARR's 73, and its "Raising its dividend" signal. However, a contrarian might favor PARR for its even lower P/E of 4.6x (A grade) and its higher Value pillar of 86, indicating a better price for its fundamentals.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LPG and PARR diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityLPG 86.1 · PARR 72.9LPG +13.2
- ValueLPG 75.5 · PARR 88.0PARR +12.5
- GrowthLPG 50.0 · PARR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.