Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LOGI scored 64.1, HPQ scored 50.4 — LOGI leads.
Compare another set
LOGI
Logitech International S.A.
Computer Hardware · Quality-Growth
64.1
$98.27 · $14.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.7
LOGI leads
HPQ
HP Inc.
Computer Hardware · Quality-Growth
50.4
$30.20 · $27.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHPQ11.5x
Fastest growthLOGI+6.3%
Highest qualityLOGI94 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueHPQ-40%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LOGI
stronger →← stronger
HPQ
94
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
35
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
LOGI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LOGI
HPQ
$1.0bC+
FCF
$3.9bB
+6.3%C+
Rev
+3.2%C+
0.04A-
D/E
Negative equity
18.0xA-
P/E
11.5xA
1.86C+
PEG
3.46D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LOGI
HPQ
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+56%
1-yr DCF upside
+76%
+53%
5-yr DCF upside
+67%
+50%
10-yr DCF upside
+55%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LOGI
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
HPQ
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
The companies
LOGILogitech International S.A.
Computer Hardware · $98.27 · beta 0.59
Why now
Computer Hardware · market cap $14.1b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $129.66 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $106.80 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
HPQHP Inc.
Computer Hardware · $30.20 · beta 1.19
Why now
Computer Hardware · market cap $27.2b. 17% off the 52-week high of $36.23. 17 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $29.66 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Net margin 4.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LOGI and HPQ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.7 points in favor of LOGI. The widest single difference is Value, where LOGI leads by 19.8 points.
ValueLOGI 63.3 · HPQ 43.5LOGI +19.8
QualityLOGI 93.5 · HPQ 84.0LOGI +9.5
GrowthLOGI 44.5 · HPQ 35.0LOGI +9.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is LOGI or HPQ the better stock?
LOGI scores higher: LOGI 64.1, HPQ 50.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do LOGI and HPQ differ most?
The widest gap is value, where LOGI leads by 20 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. LOGI leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are LOGI and HPQ scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.