COMPARE · Reviewed August 10, 2026
LIME vs SUNB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LIME scored 71.2, SUNB scored 61.4 — LIME leads.
Compare another set
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
71.2
$40.63 · $2.6B
Score gap
9.8
LIME leads
SUNB
Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc.
61.4
$78.86 · $32.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LIME
stronger →← stronger
SUNB
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
58
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
LIME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LIME
SUNB
—
FCF
$1.6bC+
+29.1%A-
Rev
+4.4%C+
0.20A-
D/E
1.43C
2.6xB
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.54C+
—
P/E
25.0xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LIME
SUNB
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
62% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-47%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-38%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-25%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LIME
Why this score
- Short track record
SUNB
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
The companies
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $2.6b. 5% off the 52-week high of $42.68. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Higher-variance name — the thesis leans on growth and valuation rather than a long, settled track record, so it depends on execution continuing. Position size accordingly; a deep drawdown shouldn't change the thesis.
SUNBSunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $32.3b. 9% off the 52-week high of $86.68. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $84.71 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.65 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 12.9x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Net margin 0.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LIME and SUNB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.8 points in favour of LIME. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthLIME 100.0 · SUNB 58.3LIME +41.7
- QualityLIME 90.3 · SUNB 65.8LIME +24.5
- ValueLIME 40.0 · SUNB 60.4SUNB +20.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.