Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LIME scored 65.1, GATX scored 65.1 — tied at the top.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LIME's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but GATX's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
65.1
$28.58 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.0
Tied
GATX
GATX Corporation
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
65.1
$164.78 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestLIME5.6x
Fastest growthLIME+29.1%
Strongest balance sheetLIME0.20
Highest qualityLIME69 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueGATX-45%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LIME
stronger →← stronger
GATX
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
58
54
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
LIME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LIME
GATX
$40mC-
FCF
$723mC+
+29.1%A-
Rev
+9.8%B
0.20A-
D/E
3.48D
5.6xA
P/E
16.3xA-
—
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LIME
GATX
98% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% below
~33%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
-61%
1-yr DCF upside
+69%
-49%
5-yr DCF upside
+82%
-26%
10-yr DCF upside
+103%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LIME
Why this score
Short track record
GATX
Why this score
Raising its dividend
The companies
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $28.58
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.8b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $44.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
GATXGATX Corporation
Rental & Leasing Services · $164.78 · beta 1.20
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $5.8b. 20% off the 52-week high of $205.56. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $219.50 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 200% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 3.48 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
LIME leads GATX by 15 points (76.9 to 61.9), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade A-). Note they play different roles — GATX screens as spec, LIME screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LIME and GATX diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthLIME 54.3 · GATX 74.3GATX +20.0
QualityLIME 68.9 · GATX 57.8LIME +11.1
ValueLIME 73.9 · GATX 64.2LIME +9.7
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is LIME or GATX the better stock?
On the Bull Rankings quality-growth score they are level: LIME and GATX both score 65.1 out of 100. The score blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number, so a tie means the model sees no meaningful edge either way — the pillar breakdown on this page shows where each is actually stronger.
Where do LIME and GATX differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where GATX leads by 20 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are LIME and GATX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.