Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LHX scored 47.0, HONA scored 72.0 — HONA leads.
Compare another set
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
47
$236.97 · $44.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
25.0
HONA leads
HONA
Honeywell Aerospace Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
72
$157.94 · $50.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestLHX23.9x
Fastest growthHONA+12.7%
Highest qualityHONA76 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueLHX-45%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LHX
stronger →← stronger
HONA
61
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
84
34
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
HONA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LHX
HONA
$2.8bB
FCF
$2.5bB
+2.5%C
Rev
+12.7%B+
0.53B
D/E
Negative equity
23.9xB+
P/E
48.2xC
1.18B+
PEG
0.98B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LHX
HONA
45% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
~-6%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
+65%
1-yr DCF upside
-19%
+80%
5-yr DCF upside
-7%
+107%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LHX
No notable signals flagged.
HONA
Why this score
Short track record
The companies
LHXL3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $236.97 · beta 0.51
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $44.1b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $379.23 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $325.18 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 151% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $157.94
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $50.1b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $297.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $201.87 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 128% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash. $50.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LHX and HONA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 25.0 points in favor of HONA. The widest single difference is Growth, where HONA leads by 33.2 points.
GrowthLHX 50.5 · HONA 83.7HONA +33.2
ValueLHX 34.1 · HONA 61.5HONA +27.4
QualityLHX 60.5 · HONA 76.0HONA +15.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is HONA or LHX the better stock?
HONA scores higher: HONA 72.0, LHX 47.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do HONA and LHX differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where HONA leads by 33 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. HONA leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are HONA and LHX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.