COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LEVI vs UAA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LEVI scored 67.0, UAA scored 23.6 — LEVI leads.
Compare another set
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
67
$21.49 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
43.4
LEVI leads
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
23.6
$5.39 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthLEVI+7.3%
- Strongest balance sheetUAA0.96
- Highest qualityLEVI74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LEVI
stronger →← stronger
UAA
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
24
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
38
LEVI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LEVI
UAA
$559mC+
FCF
-$81mF
+7.3%B
Rev
-3.6%D+
1.01B
D/E
0.96B
15.3xB+
P/E
—
1.39B
PEG
1.21B
—
P/S
0.5xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LEVI
UAA
7% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-15%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LEVI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
UAA
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
LEVILevi Strauss & Co.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $8.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $25.70. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $28.27 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
UAAUnder Armour, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $2.3b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $8.15 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $6.40 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$81m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -10.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LEVI and UAA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 43.4 points in favor of LEVI. The widest single difference is Growth, where LEVI leads by 58.2 points.
- GrowthLEVI 72.3 · UAA 14.1LEVI +58.2
- QualityLEVI 73.8 · UAA 24.2LEVI +49.6
- ValueLEVI 56.3 · UAA 38.5LEVI +17.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.