COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LEVI vs SGI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LEVI scored 67.0, SGI scored 70.2 — SGI leads.
Compare another set
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
67
$21.49 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
SGI leads
SGI
Somnigroup International Inc.
70.2
$64.71 · $13.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLEVI15.3x
- Fastest growthSGI+27.1%
- Strongest balance sheetLEVI1.01
- Highest qualityLEVI74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSGI-2%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LEVI
stronger →← stronger
SGI
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
LEVI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LEVI
SGI
$559mC+
FCF
$769mC+
+7.3%B
Rev
+27.1%A-
1.01B
D/E
1.98C+
15.3xB+
P/E
25.6xC+
1.39B
PEG
0.83B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LEVI
SGI
7% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
2% below
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-15%
1-yr DCF upside
-17%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
+2%
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
+35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LEVI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SGI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
LEVILevi Strauss & Co.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $8.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $25.70. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $28.27 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SGISomnigroup International Inc.
Why now
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $13.6b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $98.56 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.83 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $89.44 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LEVI and SGI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of SGI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthLEVI 72.3 · SGI 91.5SGI +19.2
- ValueLEVI 56.3 · SGI 52.4LEVI +3.9
- QualityLEVI 73.8 · SGI 72.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.