COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
LEVI vs RL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LEVI scored 67.0, RL scored 58.7 — LEVI leads.
Compare another set
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
67
$21.49 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.3
LEVI leads
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
58.7
$370.82 · $22.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLEVI15.3x
- Fastest growthRL+14.7%
- Strongest balance sheetLEVI1.01
- Highest qualityRL83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LEVI
stronger →← stronger
RL
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
89
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
28
RL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LEVI
RL
$559mC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+7.3%B
Rev
+14.7%B+
1.01B
D/E
1.10B
15.3xB+
P/E
23.5xC+
1.39B
PEG
2.00C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LEVI
RL
7% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
-15%
1-yr DCF upside
-39%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
-33%
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LEVI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
RL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
LEVILevi Strauss & Co.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $8.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $25.70. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $28.27 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
RLRalph Lauren Corporation
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $22.1b. 12% off the 52-week high of $421.60. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.71 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LEVI and RL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.3 points in favor of LEVI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueLEVI 56.3 · RL 27.6LEVI +28.7
- GrowthLEVI 72.3 · RL 88.8RL +16.5
- QualityLEVI 73.8 · RL 82.5RL +8.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.