COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GIL vs LEVI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GIL scored 64.1, LEVI scored 67.0 — LEVI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LEVI's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but GIL's are as of December 2025 — a 5-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
64.1
$56.17 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.9
LEVI leads
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
67
$21.49 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLEVI15.3x
- Fastest growthGIL+10.7%
- Strongest balance sheetLEVI1.01
- Highest qualityLEVI74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GIL
stronger →← stronger
LEVI
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
73
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
56
GIL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GIL
LEVI
$500mC
FCF
$559mC+
+10.7%B
Rev
+7.3%B
1.48C+
D/E
1.01B
43.5xD
P/E
15.3xB+
0.52A-
PEG
1.39B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GIL
LEVI
10% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
7% above
~14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
-25%
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
-9%
5-yr DCF upside
-6%
+20%
10-yr DCF upside
+8%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GIL
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
LEVI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
GILGildan Activewear Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $10.4b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $73.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $85.25 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
LEVILevi Strauss & Co.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $8.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $25.70. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $28.27 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GIL and LEVI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.9 points in favor of LEVI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityGIL 53.5 · LEVI 73.8LEVI +20.3
- ValueGIL 67.4 · LEVI 56.3GIL +11.1
- GrowthGIL 73.1 · LEVI 72.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.