COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

IR vs LECO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IR scored 72.8, LECO scored 61.0 — IR leads.
Compare another set
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
72.8
$78.57 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.8
IR leads
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
Tools & Accessories · Quality-Growth
61
$289.73 · $15.8B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestLECO28.9x
  • Fastest growthLECO+9.3%
  • Strongest balance sheetIR0.48
  • Highest qualityLECO82 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.5GROWTH76.5VALUE77.1
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD61.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY81.8GROWTH78.7VALUE35.3
IRLECOQuality65.581.8Growth76.578.7Value77.135.3
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%19%24x38xIRLECO

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFIR$1.2bLECO$542m
RevIR+7.8%LECO+9.3%
D/EIR0.48LECO0.77
P/EIR33.0xLECO28.9x
PEGIR0.72LECO1.76
IR
stronger →← stronger
LECO
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
LECO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
IR
LECO
$1.2bC+
FCF
$542mC+
+7.8%B
Rev
+9.3%B
0.48B+
D/E
0.77B
33.0xC+
P/E
28.9xB
0.72A-
PEG
1.76C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
IR
LECO
63% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
91% above
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~25%/yr
-44%
1-yr DCF upside
-53%
-39%
5-yr DCF upside
-48%
-30%
10-yr DCF upside
-39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
IR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
LECO
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · $78.57 · beta 1.16
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $30.5b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
Tools & Accessories · $289.73 · beta 1.22
Why now
Tools & Accessories · market cap $15.8b. 7% off the 52-week high of $310.00. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $304.91 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where IR and LECO diverge

On the headline score the gap is 11.8 points in favor of IR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.