COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
EROC vs LECO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EROC scored 72.0, LECO scored 61.0 — EROC leads.
Compare another set
EROC
ERock, Inc.
72
$13.03 · $3.6B
Score gap
11.0
EROC leads
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
61
$289.73 · $15.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLECO28.9x
- Fastest growthEROC+42.5%
- Strongest balance sheetEROC0.12
- Highest qualityLECO82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EROC
stronger →← stronger
LECO
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
EROC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EROC
LECO
—
FCF
$542mC+
+42.5%A
Rev
+9.3%B
0.12A
D/E
0.77B
46.5xC
P/E
28.9xB
0.18A
PEG
1.76C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EROC
LECO
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
91% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~25%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-53%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-48%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EROC
Why this score
- Short track record
LECO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
EROCERock, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.6b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $20.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.18 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.88 (implying +76% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -66.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 47x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Tools & Accessories · market cap $15.8b. 7% off the 52-week high of $310.00. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $304.91 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EROC and LECO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.0 points in favor of EROC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEROC 98.2 · LECO 35.3EROC +62.9
- QualityEROC 58.2 · LECO 81.8LECO +23.6
- GrowthEROC 98.5 · LECO 78.7EROC +19.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.