COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LCII vs LEA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LCII scored 63.0, LEA scored 62.3 — LCII leads.
Compare another set
LCII
LCI Industries
63
$104.42 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.7
LCII leads
LEA
Lear Corporation
62.3
$128.54 · $8.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLEA11.7x
- Fastest growthLCII+4.1%
- Strongest balance sheetLEA0.66
- Highest qualityLCII65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLCII-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LCII
stronger →← stronger
LEA
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
54
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
78
LCII is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LCII
LEA
$287mC
FCF
$849mC+
+4.1%C+
Rev
+3.5%C+
0.80B
D/E
0.66B+
12.1xA-
P/E
11.7xA-
1.04B+
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LCII
LEA
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
33% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+57%
1-yr DCF upside
+32%
+74%
5-yr DCF upside
+50%
+102%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LCII
No notable signals flagged.
LEA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
LCIILCI Industries
Why now
Recreational Vehicles · market cap $2.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $159.66 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.40 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
LEALear Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $8.6b. 14% off the 52-week high of $150.33. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $150.50 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LCII and LEA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.7 points in favor of LCII. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueLCII 70.8 · LEA 77.7LEA +6.9
- GrowthLCII 54.0 · LEA 50.0LCII +4.0
- QualityLCII 65.3 · LEA 62.3LCII +3.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.