COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ALV vs LEA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALV scored 65.4, LEA scored 62.3 — ALV leads.
Compare another set
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
65.4
$125.37 · $9.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.1
ALV leads
LEA
Lear Corporation
62.3
$128.54 · $8.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLEA11.7x
- Fastest growthALV+5.9%
- Strongest balance sheetLEA0.66
- Highest qualityALV80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLEA-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALV
stronger →← stronger
LEA
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
78
ALV and LEA split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALV
LEA
$757mC+
FCF
$849mC+
+5.9%C+
Rev
+3.5%C+
0.88B
D/E
0.66B+
14.8xA-
P/E
11.7xA-
0.85B+
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALV
LEA
18% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
33% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+5%
1-yr DCF upside
+32%
+22%
5-yr DCF upside
+50%
+51%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
LEA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ALVAutoliv, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $9.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $132.17. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.71 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LEALear Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $8.6b. 14% off the 52-week high of $150.33. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $150.50 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ALV and LEA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.1 points in favor of ALV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityALV 79.8 · LEA 62.3ALV +17.5
- ValueALV 70.1 · LEA 77.7LEA +7.6
- GrowthALV 50.0 · LEA 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.