COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LCII vs XPEV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LCII scored 63.0, XPEV scored 29.9 — LCII leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LCII's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but XPEV's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
LCII
LCI Industries
63
$104.42 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
33.1
LCII leads
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
29.9
$12.19 · $11.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthXPEV+87.7%
- Strongest balance sheetLCII0.80
- Highest qualityLCII65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLCII-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LCII
stronger →← stronger
XPEV
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
24
54
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
LCII is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LCII
XPEV
$287mC
FCF
—
+4.1%C+
Rev
+87.7%A
0.80B
D/E
0.83B
12.1xA-
P/E
—
1.04B+
PEG
—
—
P/S
1.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LCII
XPEV
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+57%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+74%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+102%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LCII
No notable signals flagged.
XPEV
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
LCIILCI Industries
Why now
Recreational Vehicles · market cap $2.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $159.66 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.40 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
XPEVXPeng Inc.
Why now
Auto Manufacturers · market cap $11.7b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $28.23 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +88% — in hypergrowth territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.15 (implying +82% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -1.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LCII and XPEV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 33.1 points in favor of LCII. The widest single difference is Quality, where LCII leads by 41.1 points.
- QualityLCII 65.3 · XPEV 24.2LCII +41.1
- ValueLCII 70.8 · XPEV 40.0LCII +30.8
- GrowthLCII 54.0 · XPEV 50.0LCII +4.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.