COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

LAUR vs STRA

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LAUR scored 74.5, STRA scored 73.2 — LAUR leads.
Compare another set
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
Education & Training Services · Quality-Growth
74.5
$37.46 · $5.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.3
LAUR leads
STRA
Strategic Education, Inc.
Education & Training Services · Quality-Growth
73.2
$83.42 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSTRA13.9x
  • Fastest growthLAUR+17.9%
  • Strongest balance sheetSTRA0.07
  • Highest qualityLAUR91 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueSTRA-45%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD74.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY91.0GROWTH80.5VALUE56.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD73.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY69.4GROWTH61.9VALUE91.4
LAURSTRAQuality91.069.4Growth80.561.9Value56.691.4
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-6%28%8.9x22xLAURSTRA

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFLAUR$287mSTRA$169m
RevLAUR+17.9%STRA+3.5%
D/ELAUR0.64STRA0.07
P/ELAUR17.0xSTRA13.9x
PEGLAUR1.23STRA0.75
LAUR
stronger →← stronger
STRA
91
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
62
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
91
LAUR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
LAUR
STRA
$287mC
FCF
$169mC
+17.9%B+
Rev
+3.5%C+
0.64B+
D/E
0.07A
17.0xB+
P/E
13.9xA-
1.23B
PEG
0.75A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
LAUR
STRA
5% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-4%/yr
-9%
1-yr DCF upside
+52%
+5%
5-yr DCF upside
+82%
+30%
10-yr DCF upside
+137%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
LAUR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
STRA
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
LAURLaureate Education, Inc.
Education & Training Services · $37.46 · beta 0.45
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $5.2b. 8% off the 52-week high of $40.92. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $41.21 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
STRAStrategic Education, Inc.
Education & Training Services · $83.42 · beta 0.50
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $1.9b. 7% off the 52-week high of $89.73. PEG 0.75 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $98.33 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where LAUR and STRA diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.3 points in favor of LAUR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.