COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
KYIV vs VZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KYIV scored 68.3, VZ scored 55.4 — KYIV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. VZ's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KYIV's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
KYIV
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
68.3
$13.25 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.9
KYIV leads
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
55.4
$49.45 · $205.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestVZ12.9x
- Fastest growthKYIV+25.9%
- Strongest balance sheetKYIV0.39
- Highest qualityVZ71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKYIV-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KYIV
stronger →← stronger
VZ
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
52
54
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
KYIV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KYIV
VZ
$311mC
FCF
$21.8bA
+25.9%A-
Rev
+1.4%C
0.39B+
D/E
1.84C
19.2xB
P/E
12.9xB+
1.28B
PEG
0.93B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KYIV
VZ
53% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
39% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
+73%
1-yr DCF upside
+60%
+113%
5-yr DCF upside
+65%
+188%
10-yr DCF upside
+72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KYIV
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
VZ
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $3.1b. 20% off the 52-week high of $16.55. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.96 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
VZVerizon Communications Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $205.5b. 4% off the 52-week high of $51.68. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 23 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $51.56 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $205.5b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Dividend payout 73% of earnings on a 5.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KYIV and VZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.9 points in favor of KYIV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthKYIV 88.2 · VZ 51.7KYIV +36.5
- ValueKYIV 53.6 · VZ 46.4KYIV +7.2
- QualityKYIV 67.4 · VZ 71.1VZ +3.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.