COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
KYIV vs TMUS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KYIV scored 68.5, TMUS scored 71.7 — TMUS leads.
Compare another set
KYIV
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
68.5
$14.05 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
TMUS leads
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
71.7
$174.74 · $187.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KYIV
stronger →← stronger
TMUS
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
TMUS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KYIV
TMUS
$311mC
FCF
$18.4bA-
+25.9%A-
Rev
+9.7%B
0.39B+
D/E
2.14C
19.8xB
P/E
18.3xB
1.36B
PEG
0.84B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KYIV
TMUS
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
+68%
+97%
5-yr DCF upside
+109%
+161%
10-yr DCF upside
+186%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KYIV
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
TMUS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $3.2b. 15% off the 52-week high of $16.55. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.74 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $187.4b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $261.56 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.84 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $243.08 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 174% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $187.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.14 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.