COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CL vs KVUE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CL scored 56.7, KVUE scored 54.1 — CL leads.
Compare another set
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
56.7
$91.08 · $72.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.6
CL leads
KVUE
Kenvue Inc.
54.1
$19.06 · $36.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKVUE22.4x
- Fastest growthCL+5.2%
- Highest qualityCL89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CL
stronger →← stronger
KVUE
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
30
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
CL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CL
KVUE
$3.9bB
FCF
$1.9bC+
+5.2%C+
Rev
+1.8%C
—
D/E
0.82B
35.9xC
P/E
22.4xB
1.75C+
PEG
1.54C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CL
KVUE
20% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
-22%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
-20%
-12%
10-yr DCF upside
-17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CL
Why this score
- Durable high returns
KVUE
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CLColgate-Palmolive Company
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $72.6b. 8% off the 52-week high of $99.33. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $98.95 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 189% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $72.6b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
KVUEKenvue Inc.
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $36.6b. 12% off the 52-week high of $21.63. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $19.50 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 98% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CL and KVUE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.6 points in favor of CL. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCL 89.0 · KVUE 69.9CL +19.1
- GrowthCL 67.7 · KVUE 49.3CL +18.4
- ValueCL 30.3 · KVUE 46.0KVUE +15.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.