COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DECK vs KTB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DECK scored 79.7, KTB scored 78.1 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.7
$88.86 · $12.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.6
DECK leads
KTB
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
78.1
$78.99 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDECK12.6x
- Fastest growthKTB+34.3%
- Strongest balance sheetDECK0.21
- Highest qualityDECK96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKTB-59%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DECK
stronger →← stronger
KTB
96
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
89
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
DECK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DECK
KTB
$1.1bC+
FCF
$422mC
+7.9%B
Rev
+34.3%A
0.21A-
D/E
2.06C
12.6xA-
P/E
16.0xB+
1.12B+
PEG
0.65A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DECK
KTB
30% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
59% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
+29%
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
+43%
5-yr DCF upside
+146%
+65%
10-yr DCF upside
+266%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
KTB
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $12.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $4.3b. 11% off the 52-week high of $88.96. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.70 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors DECK (79.3) over KTB (77.3), driven by DECK's superior Quality pillar score of 95 versus KTB's 78 and its A- grade for Debt/Equity (0.21). However, a contrarian could prefer KTB, which implies a deeply pessimistic -6% annual growth, offering a larger margin of safety at -54% below fair value.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DECK and KTB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.6 points in favor of DECK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityDECK 95.7 · KTB 79.6DECK +16.1
- GrowthDECK 74.3 · KTB 88.8KTB +14.5
- ValueDECK 71.3 · KTB 67.3DECK +4.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.