COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
KT vs VIV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KT scored 33.8, VIV scored 61.4 — VIV leads.
Compare another set
KT
KT Corporation
33.8
$19.60 · $9.3B
Score gap
27.6
VIV leads
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.
61.4
$11.33 · $18.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKT10.2x
- Fastest growthVIV+6.7%
- Strongest balance sheetVIV0.30
- Highest qualityVIV63 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVIV-55%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KT
stronger →← stronger
VIV
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
77
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
VIV is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KT
VIV
$1.3bC+
FCF
$2.2bB
+0.4%C
Rev
+6.7%C+
0.62B
D/E
0.30A-
10.2xA-
P/E
14.2xB+
4.41D
PEG
0.92B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KT
VIV
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
55% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+93%
1-yr DCF upside
+94%
+87%
5-yr DCF upside
+121%
+79%
10-yr DCF upside
+167%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KT
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
VIV
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
KTKT Corporation
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $9.3b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $24.58 — deep drawdown territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.94 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 133% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $18.6b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $17.26 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $15.05 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 174% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 120% of earnings on a 8.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KT and VIV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 27.6 points in favor of VIV. The widest single difference is Value, where VIV leads by 38.2 points.
- ValueKT 27.0 · VIV 65.2VIV +38.2
- GrowthKT 42.9 · VIV 77.4VIV +34.5
- QualityKT 45.9 · VIV 62.9VIV +17.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.