COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
KT vs VEON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KT scored 33.8, VEON scored 56.5 — VEON leads.
Compare another set
KT
KT Corporation
33.8
$19.60 · $9.3B
Score gap
22.7
VEON leads
VEON
VEON Ltd.
56.5
$62.34 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKT10.2x
- Fastest growthVEON+9.9%
- Strongest balance sheetKT0.62
- Highest qualityVEON78 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVEON-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KT
stronger →← stronger
VEON
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
VEON is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KT
VEON
$1.3bC+
FCF
$620mC+
+0.4%C
Rev
+9.9%B
0.62B
D/E
3.05C
10.2xA-
P/E
62.3xC
4.41D
PEG
2.23C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KT
VEON
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+93%
1-yr DCF upside
+70%
+87%
5-yr DCF upside
+113%
+79%
10-yr DCF upside
+191%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KT
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
VEON
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
KTKT Corporation
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $9.3b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $24.58 — deep drawdown territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.94 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 133% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VEONVEON Ltd.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $63.29 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.59 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 105% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 3.05 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 62.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KT and VEON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.7 points in favor of VEON. The widest single difference is Quality, where VEON leads by 32.3 points.
- QualityKT 45.9 · VEON 78.2VEON +32.3
- GrowthKT 42.9 · VEON 68.6VEON +25.7
- ValueKT 27.0 · VEON 33.7VEON +6.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.