COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
KT vs TIGO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KT scored 33.8, TIGO scored 58.6 — TIGO leads.
Compare another set
KT
KT Corporation
33.8
$19.60 · $9.3B
Score gap
24.8
TIGO leads
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
58.6
$93.22 · $15.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKT10.2x
- Fastest growthKT+0.4%
- Strongest balance sheetKT0.62
- Highest qualityTIGO76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKT-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KT
stronger →← stronger
TIGO
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
47
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
TIGO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KT
TIGO
$1.3bC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+0.4%C
Rev
+0.3%C
0.62B
D/E
4.85D
10.2xA-
P/E
23.3xB
4.41D
PEG
0.55A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KT
TIGO
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
43% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+93%
1-yr DCF upside
+34%
+87%
5-yr DCF upside
+76%
+79%
10-yr DCF upside
+165%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KT
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
TIGO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
KTKT Corporation
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $9.3b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $24.58 — deep drawdown territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.94 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 133% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
TIGOMillicom International Cellular S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $107.13. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.39 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.85 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KT and TIGO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 24.8 points in favor of TIGO. The widest single difference is Quality, where TIGO leads by 30.1 points.
- QualityKT 45.9 · TIGO 76.0TIGO +30.1
- ValueKT 27.0 · TIGO 56.7TIGO +29.7
- GrowthKT 42.9 · TIGO 46.7TIGO +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.