COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GDDY vs KSPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GDDY scored 85.4, KSPI scored 67.0 — GDDY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GDDY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KSPI's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GDDY
GoDaddy Inc.
85.4
$98.36 · $12.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.4
GDDY leads
KSPI
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
67
$105.55 · $20.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKSPI9.0x
- Fastest growthKSPI+59.8%
- Highest qualityGDDY95 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGDDY-64%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GDDY
stronger →← stronger
KSPI
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
85
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
GDDY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GDDY
KSPI
$1.7bC+
FCF
$1.5bC+
+7.4%B
Rev
+59.8%A
—
D/E
0.22B
14.6xA-
P/E
9.0xA
0.68A-
PEG
1.07B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GDDY
KSPI
64% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
20% below
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+139%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
+178%
5-yr DCF upside
+24%
+245%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GDDY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
KSPI
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (KZT)
The companies
GDDYGoDaddy Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $12.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $150.47 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $104.80 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
KSPIJoint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $20.1b. Trading near 52-week high of $106.05 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +60% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $103.40 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 41% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GDDY and KSPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.4 points in favor of GDDY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGDDY 75.3 · KSPI 98.1KSPI +22.8
- ValueGDDY 86.8 · KSPI 65.6GDDY +21.2
- QualityGDDY 95.4 · KSPI 84.8GDDY +10.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.