COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
KRMN vs TXT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KRMN scored 33.1, TXT scored 70.4 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
KRMN
Karman Holdings Inc.
33.1
$53.40 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
37.3
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
70.4
$82.95 · $14.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthKRMN+50.2%
- Strongest balance sheetTXT0.52
- Highest qualityTXT64 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTXT-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KRMN
stronger →← stronger
TXT
51
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
7
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
TXT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KRMN
TXT
-$28mF
FCF
$759mC+
+50.2%A
Rev
+8.8%B
2.08D
D/E
0.52B
12.0xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.16B+
—
P/E
15.6xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KRMN
TXT
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KRMN
Why this score
- Short track record
TXT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
KRMNKarman Holdings Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $7.1b. Down 55% from 52-week high of $118.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.10 (implying +63% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$28m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 197.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
TXTTextron Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $14.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $101.57. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.89 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KRMN and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 37.3 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueKRMN 7.4 · TXT 72.1TXT +64.7
- GrowthKRMN 96.1 · TXT 75.1KRMN +21.0
- QualityKRMN 51.0 · TXT 64.5TXT +13.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.