Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KRMN scored 57.4, TXT scored 69.1 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
KRMN
Karman Holdings Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
57.4
$32.59 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.7
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
69.1
$74.16 · $12.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthKRMN+50.2%
Strongest balance sheetTXT0.52
Highest qualityTXT67 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueTXT-6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KRMN
stronger →← stronger
TXT
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
97
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
TXT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KRMN
TXT
-$28mF
FCF
$759mC+
+50.2%A
Rev
+8.8%B
2.08D
D/E
0.52B+
7.3xD
P/S
—
1.88C+
PEG
0.85B+
—
P/E
14.0xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KRMN
TXT
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
0%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KRMN
Why this score
Short track record
TXT
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
KRMNKarman Holdings Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $32.59
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $4.3b. Down 72% from 52-week high of $118.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.27 (implying +156% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$28m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 116.4x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
TXTTextron Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $74.16 · beta 0.91
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $12.8b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $101.57 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $100.27 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KRMN and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.7 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueKRMN 38.4 · TXT 75.6TXT +37.2
GrowthKRMN 97.5 · TXT 65.2KRMN +32.3
QualityKRMN 50.5 · TXT 67.1TXT +16.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TXT or KRMN the better stock?
TXT scores higher: TXT 69.1, KRMN 57.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TXT and KRMN differ most?
The widest gap is value, where TXT leads by 37 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are TXT and KRMN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.