COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
KRMN vs SARO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KRMN scored 33.1, SARO scored 71.3 — SARO leads.
Compare another set
KRMN
Karman Holdings Inc.
33.1
$53.40 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
38.2
SARO leads
SARO
StandardAero, Inc.
71.3
$25.06 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthKRMN+50.2%
- Strongest balance sheetSARO0.93
- Highest qualitySARO57 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KRMN
stronger →← stronger
SARO
51
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
7
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
SARO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KRMN
SARO
-$28mF
FCF
$219mC
+50.2%A
Rev
+12.6%B+
2.08D
D/E
0.93C+
12.0xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
0.73A-
—
P/E
25.8xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KRMN
SARO
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~27%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-56%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-48%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-34%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KRMN
Why this score
- Short track record
SARO
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
KRMNKarman Holdings Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $7.1b. Down 55% from 52-week high of $118.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.10 (implying +63% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$28m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 197.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
SAROStandardAero, Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $8.3b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $34.48 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $35.81 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KRMN and SARO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 38.2 points in favor of SARO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueKRMN 7.4 · SARO 72.9SARO +65.5
- GrowthKRMN 96.1 · SARO 87.6KRMN +8.5
- QualityKRMN 51.0 · SARO 56.7SARO +5.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.