COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FTAI vs KRMN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTAI scored 68.2, KRMN scored 33.1 — FTAI leads.
Compare another set
FTAI
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
68.2
$209.70 · $21.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.1
FTAI leads
KRMN
Karman Holdings Inc.
33.1
$53.40 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFTAI6.9x
- Fastest growthKRMN+50.2%
- Strongest balance sheetKRMN2.08
- Highest qualityKRMN51 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTAI
stronger →← stronger
KRMN
47
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
97
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
7
FTAI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTAI
KRMN
-$890mF
FCF
-$28mF
+45.3%A
Rev
+50.2%A
8.65D
D/E
2.08D
6.9xC
P/S
12.0xD
0.39A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
FTAI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
KRMN
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $21.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $323.51 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.39 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $364.00 (implying +74% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
D/E 8.65 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$890m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
KRMNKarman Holdings Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $7.1b. Down 55% from 52-week high of $118.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.10 (implying +63% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$28m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 197.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTAI and KRMN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.1 points in favor of FTAI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFTAI 68.9 · KRMN 7.4FTAI +61.5
- QualityFTAI 47.3 · KRMN 51.0KRMN +3.7
- GrowthFTAI 97.4 · KRMN 96.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.