COMPARE · Data as of October 13, 2026

KRC vs DEI

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KRC scored 65.0, DEI scored 62.0 — KRC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DEI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KRC's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
REIT - Office · Financial strength
84.2Fin
$34.93 · $4.1B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
13.6
KRC leads
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
70.6Fin
$9.83 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthDEI+1.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetKRC0.86
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD84.2/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT84.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD70.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT70.6
YieldKRC6.3%DEI7.8%
RevKRC-2.0%DEI+1.8%
D/EKRC0.86DEI1.63
KRC
DEI
6.3%A-
Yield
7.8%A-
-2.0%D+
Rev
+1.8%C
0.86B+
D/E
1.63C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
KRCKilroy Realty Corporation
REIT - Office · $34.93 · beta 1.19
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $4.1b. 20% off the 52-week high of $43.58. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $40.07 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Dividend payout 151% of earnings on a 6.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
DEIDouglas Emmett, Inc.
REIT - Office · $9.83 · beta 1.21
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $2.0b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $13.98 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $13.00 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Dividend payout 844% of earnings on a 7.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE -2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is KRC or DEI the better stock?

KRC scores higher: KRC 65.0, DEI 62.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are KRC and DEI scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.