COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
KNX vs SKYW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KNX scored 42.2, SKYW scored 62.0 — SKYW leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SKYW's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KNX's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
42.2
$69.55 · $11.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.8
SKYW leads
SKYW
SkyWest, Inc.
62
$99.39 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSKYW+9.1%
- Strongest balance sheetKNX0.38
- Highest qualitySKYW70 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSKYW-68%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KNX
stronger →← stronger
SKYW
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
24
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
SKYW is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KNX
SKYW
$470mC
FCF
$909mC+
+1.1%C
Rev
+9.1%B
0.38B+
D/E
0.86C+
1.5xB+
P/S
—
0.51A-
PEG
1.66C+
—
P/E
9.9xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KNX
SKYW
18% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
68% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-20%/yr
-36%
1-yr DCF upside
+181%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
+215%
+25%
10-yr DCF upside
+270%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KNX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SKYW
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
Why now
Trucking · market cap $11.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $82.86. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.63 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Net margin 0.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 0% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SKYWSkyWest, Inc.
Why now
Airlines · market cap $3.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $123.67. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $126.50 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KNX and SKYW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.8 points in favor of SKYW. The widest single difference is Growth, where SKYW leads by 26.1 points.
- GrowthKNX 23.9 · SKYW 50.0SKYW +26.1
- QualityKNX 45.3 · SKYW 70.5SKYW +25.2
- ValueKNX 69.5 · SKYW 67.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.