COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
HAFN vs KNX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HAFN scored 72.0, KNX scored 42.2 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
72
$7.77 · $3.9B
Score gap
29.8
HAFN leads
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
42.2
$69.55 · $11.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthHAFN+7.4%
- Strongest balance sheetKNX0.38
- Highest qualityHAFN94 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-68%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HAFN
stronger →← stronger
KNX
94
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
24
96
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
HAFN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HAFN
KNX
$981mC+
FCF
$470mC
+7.4%B
Rev
+1.1%C
0.40B+
D/E
0.38B+
8.6xA
P/E
—
—
PEG
0.51A-
—
P/S
1.5xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HAFN
KNX
68% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% above
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
+243%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
+208%
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
+166%
10-yr DCF upside
+25%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HAFN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
KNX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
HAFNHafnia Limited
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.9b. 19% off the 52-week high of $9.54.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
Why now
Trucking · market cap $11.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $82.86. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.63 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Net margin 0.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 0% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HAFN and KNX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.8 points in favor of HAFN. The widest single difference is Quality, where HAFN leads by 48.5 points.
- QualityHAFN 93.8 · KNX 45.3HAFN +48.5
- ValueHAFN 96.5 · KNX 69.5HAFN +27.0
- GrowthHAFN 43.1 · KNX 23.9HAFN +19.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.