COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
KLAC vs SKHY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KLAC scored 51.0, SKHY scored 72.0 — SKHY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. KLAC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SKHY's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
KLAC
KLA Corporation
51
$179.76 · $234.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.0
SKHY leads
SKHY
SK hynix Inc.
72
$163.41 · $1.2T
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSKHY10.0x
- Fastest growthSKHY+46.8%
- Strongest balance sheetSKHY0.07
- Highest qualitySKHY92 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KLAC
stronger →← stronger
SKHY
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
85
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
23
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
79
SKHY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KLAC
SKHY
$3.8bB
FCF
$29.3bA
+11.7%B
Rev
+46.8%A
0.97C
D/E
0.07B+
49.1xC+
P/E
10.0xA
1.79C+
PEG
0.31A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KLAC
SKHY
293% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
194% above
~51%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~47%/yr
-80%
1-yr DCF upside
-74%
-75%
5-yr DCF upside
-66%
-65%
10-yr DCF upside
-52%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KLAC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SKHY
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
The companies
KLACKLA Corporation
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $234.9b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $307.37 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $231.78 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 76% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $234.9b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 49x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
SKHYSK hynix Inc.
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $1.2T. 16% off the 52-week high of $194.80. Revenue growing +47% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $245.43 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 86% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 93% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $1.2T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KLAC and SKHY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.0 points in favor of SKHY. The widest single difference is Value, where SKHY leads by 56.3 points.
- ValueKLAC 23.1 · SKHY 79.4SKHY +56.3
- QualityKLAC 67.9 · SKHY 91.8SKHY +23.9
- GrowthKLAC 84.7 · SKHY 97.5SKHY +12.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.