Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KIM scored 69.0, EPRT scored 76.0 — EPRT leads.
Compare another set
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
REIT - Retail · Financial strength
75.7Fin
$22.45 · $15.1B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
3.6
EPRT leads
EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
REIT - Retail · Financial strength
79.3Fin
$25.68 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthEPRT+24.8%
Strongest balance sheetEPRT0.66
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KIM
EPRT
5.1%A-
Yield
5.1%A-
+5.1%C+
Rev
+24.8%A-
0.85B+
D/E
0.66A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
KIMKimco Realty Corporation
REIT - Retail · $22.45 · beta 0.96
Why now
REIT - Retail · market cap $15.1b. 16% off the 52-week high of $26.65. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.51 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 121% of earnings on a 5.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
EPRTEssential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
REIT - Retail · $25.68 · beta 0.84
Why now
REIT - Retail · market cap $5.6b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $34.73 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +25%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $36.15 (implying +41% upside).
Moat
Net margin 44% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma.
Risk
Dividend payout 96% of earnings on a 5.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is EPRT or KIM the better stock?
EPRT scores higher: EPRT 76.0, KIM 69.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are EPRT and KIM scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.