COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
KFY vs VRSK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KFY scored 71.7, VRSK scored 69.0 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.7
$85.06 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.7
KFY leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
69
$187.50 · $24.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.3x
- Fastest growthKFY+6.4%
- Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVRSK-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KFY
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
VRSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KFY
VRSK
$324mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+6.4%C+
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.30A-
D/E
—
16.3xA-
P/E
28.8xB
1.20B+
PEG
1.77C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KFY
VRSK
8% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+0%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
+8%
5-yr DCF upside
+15%
+21%
10-yr DCF upside
+39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
VRSK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $85.97 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.4b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
VRSK leads KFY by 0.2 points (72.2 to 72.0), its sharpest advantage coming in FCF (grade C+). A contrarian could still prefer KFY, which trades about 8% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. All screen as growth-type names but sit in different sectors (Staffing & Employment Services versus Consulting Services), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KFY and VRSK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.7 points in favor of KFY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueKFY 70.6 · VRSK 56.6KFY +14.0
- QualityKFY 76.6 · VRSK 82.1VRSK +5.5
- GrowthKFY 68.2 · VRSK 70.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.