COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
KFY vs RBA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KFY scored 71.7, RBA scored 63.8 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.7
$84.36 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.9
KFY leads
RBA
RB Global, Inc.
63.8
$87.02 · $16.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.2x
- Fastest growthRBA+9.7%
- Strongest balance sheetKFY0.30
- Highest qualityKFY76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKFY-9%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KFY
stronger →← stronger
RBA
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
KFY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KFY
RBA
$324mC
FCF
$611mC+
+6.4%C+
Rev
+9.7%B
0.30A-
D/E
0.78B
16.2xA-
P/E
37.5xC+
1.20B+
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KFY
RBA
9% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
+1%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+9%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+22%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
RBA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $86.22 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
RBARB Global, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $16.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $119.58 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $128.91 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KFY and RBA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.9 points in favor of KFY. The widest single difference is Quality, where KFY leads by 16.6 points.
- QualityKFY 76.5 · RBA 59.9KFY +16.6
- ValueKFY 70.6 · RBA 61.2KFY +9.4
- GrowthKFY 68.2 · RBA 70.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.