COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FCN vs KFY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCN scored 75.1, KFY scored 71.7 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
75.1
$153.49 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.4
FCN leads
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.7
$84.59 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.2x
- Fastest growthFCN+7.1%
- Strongest balance sheetKFY0.30
- Highest qualityKFY77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FCN
stronger →← stronger
KFY
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
83
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
FCN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FCN
KFY
$359mC
FCF
$324mC
+7.1%B
Rev
+6.4%C+
0.95C+
D/E
0.30A-
18.6xA-
P/E
16.2xA-
0.96B+
PEG
1.20B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FCN
KFY
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+42%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
+71%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
+123%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.2b. 19% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $85.97 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
FCN leads KFY by 3.4 points (75.1 to 71.7), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer KFY, which trades about 8% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — FCN screens as value, KFY screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FCN and KFY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.4 points in favor of FCN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFCN 82.7 · KFY 70.6FCN +12.1
- QualityFCN 68.6 · KFY 76.6KFY +8.0
- GrowthFCN 74.6 · KFY 68.2FCN +6.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.