COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DLB vs KFY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DLB scored 64.8, KFY scored 71.7 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
64.8
$66.10 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.9
KFY leads
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.7
$84.70 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.2x
- Fastest growthKFY+6.4%
- Strongest balance sheetDLB0.02
- Highest qualityKFY77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKFY-8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DLB
stronger →← stronger
KFY
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
KFY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DLB
KFY
$345mC
FCF
$324mC
+5.9%C+
Rev
+6.4%C+
0.02A
D/E
0.30A-
28.1xB
P/E
16.2xA-
1.29B
PEG
1.20B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DLB
KFY
5% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+1%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
+5%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
+12%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DLB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $6.2b. 12% off the 52-week high of $75.39. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $79.00 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $86.22 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DLB and KFY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.9 points in favor of KFY. The widest single difference is Value, where KFY leads by 13.7 points.
- ValueDLB 56.9 · KFY 70.6KFY +13.7
- GrowthDLB 65.0 · KFY 68.2KFY +3.2
- QualityDLB 73.6 · KFY 76.6KFY +3.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.