COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FTV vs KEYS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTV scored 58.0, KEYS scored 54.8 — FTV leads.
Compare another set
FTV
Fortive Corporation
58
$60.41 · $18.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
FTV leads
KEYS
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
54.8
$308.70 · $52.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFTV32.0x
- Fastest growthKEYS+8.0%
- Strongest balance sheetKEYS0.42
- Highest qualityKEYS72 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTV
stronger →← stronger
KEYS
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
KEYS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTV
KEYS
$966mC+
FCF
$1.4bC+
+3.6%C+
Rev
+8.0%B
0.59C+
D/E
0.42B
32.0xB
P/E
41.7xC+
0.98B+
PEG
1.14B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FTV
KEYS
13% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
119% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~32%/yr
-17%
1-yr DCF upside
-62%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
-54%
-4%
10-yr DCF upside
-40%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FTV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
KEYS
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
FTVFortive Corporation
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $18.2b. 6% off the 52-week high of $64.56. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $64.31 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 194% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
KEYSKeysight Technologies, Inc.
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $52.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $374.96. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $415.08 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 129% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 42x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTV and KEYS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of FTV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFTV 55.6 · KEYS 31.6FTV +24.0
- GrowthFTV 56.1 · KEYS 72.3KEYS +16.2
- QualityFTV 62.5 · KEYS 71.9KEYS +9.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.