COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs KEP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, KEP scored 53.9 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
29.1
CIG leads
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
53.9
$11.26 · $14.5B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKEP2.6x
- Fastest growthCIG+8.1%
- Highest qualityKEP74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKEP-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
KEP
$354mC
FCF
$3.6bB
+8.1%B
Rev
+4.3%C+
0.78A
D/E
—
6.2xA
P/E
2.6xA
0.33A
PEG
0.44A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CIG
KEP
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
—
1-yr DCF upside
+297%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+256%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+206%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
KEP
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
KEPKorea Electric Power Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $14.5b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $23.41 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.44 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.