COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026

HHH vs JLL

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HHH scored 71.0, JLL scored 82.0 — JLL leads.
Compare another set
HHH
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
Real Estate - Development · Financial strength
58.6Fin
$64.80 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
9.6
HHH leads
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Real Estate Services · Financial strength
49Fin
$378.01 · $17.4B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthJLL+11.4%
  • Strongest balance sheetJLL0.42
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT58.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD49.0/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT49.0
RevHHH-15.8%JLL+11.4%
D/EHHH1.35JLL0.42
HHH
JLL
0.0%C
Yield
0.0%C
-15.8%F
Rev
+11.4%B
1.35C+
D/E
0.42A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
HHHHoward Hughes Holdings Inc.
Real Estate - Development · $64.80 · beta 1.14
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $3.9b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $91.07 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -16% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $89.67 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Revenue contracting -16% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
JLLJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Real Estate Services · $378.01 · beta 1.24
Why now
Real Estate Services · market cap $17.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $393.84. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $421.40 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.