COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
JKHY vs PGY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. JKHY scored 73.1, PGY scored 86.1 — PGY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PGY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but JKHY's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
73.1
$169.73 · $12.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.0
PGY leads
PGY
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.
86.1
$21.98 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPGY15.6x
- Fastest growthPGY+25.6%
- Strongest balance sheetJKHY0.06
- Highest qualityJKHY93 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePGY-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
JKHY
stronger →← stronger
PGY
93
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
92
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
99
PGY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
JKHY
PGY
$728mC+
FCF
$252mC
+8.4%B
Rev
+25.6%A-
0.06A-
D/E
1.34C
24.4xB+
P/E
15.6xA-
2.11C
PEG
0.04A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
JKHY
PGY
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+44%
1-yr DCF upside
+115%
+55%
5-yr DCF upside
+133%
+73%
10-yr DCF upside
+162%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
JKHY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
PGY
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $12.1b. 12% off the 52-week high of $193.39. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $191.53 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
PGYPagaya Technologies Ltd.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $1.8b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $44.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $29.20 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 5.37 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where JKHY and PGY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.0 points in favor of PGY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueJKHY 59.9 · PGY 99.0PGY +39.1
- QualityJKHY 92.7 · PGY 70.1JKHY +22.6
- GrowthJKHY 70.4 · PGY 91.9PGY +21.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.